Print Page | Close Window

Keeper

Printed From: Tamworth Fans Forum
Category: Fans' Forum
Forum Name: TFC Fans Forum
Forum Description: Anything goes in here!
URL: http://www.tamworthfans.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=874
Printed Date: 19 Nov 2017 at 4:59am


Topic: Keeper
Posted By: JoeyTFC
Subject: Keeper
Date Posted: 18 Oct 2017 at 5:57pm

So people, who would you have in goal? Rowley or Jezeph?    


http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/shrewsbury-town-stopper-ex-baggies-13780980" rel="nofollow - http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/shrewsbury-town-stopper-ex-baggies-13780980




Replies:
Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 18 Oct 2017 at 6:07pm
Wow - Kop out Joey big time - you go first


Posted By: JoeyTFC
Date Posted: 18 Oct 2017 at 7:51pm
Rowley for me Argus. I suspect most would say Jezeph though


Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 18 Oct 2017 at 8:10pm
Not much in it and that's the problem Joey - yep side with you but neither have impressed - and that's nothing to do with who've they followed - 🔔 best seen ever down here


Posted By: Shed 1993
Date Posted: 18 Oct 2017 at 8:16pm
Rowley


Posted By: I.O.M.Lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 2:29am
Jezeph every time. If there isn't much between them we should be giving game time and experience to our own young player, not a short term loanee, plus, Rowley was abysmal against FC United, deserved to be dropped and now Jezeph deserves a few games to show what he can do.


Posted By: Shed 1993
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 3:19am
Yet the game before against kiddy he made a match winning save? Short memory?


Posted By: I.O.M.Lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 6:24am
Not so much a short memory shed, just not impressed by him over the course of the season, so would prefer our own player to be getting the experience.


Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 10:04am
Originally posted by I.O.M.Lamb I.O.M.Lamb wrote:

Not so much a short memory shed, just not impressed by him over the course of the season, so would prefer our own player to be getting the experience.


Rowley has edge for me - looks more comfortable playing out from back and not so rushed when doing so - if both were equal accept your argument IOM but in my opinion Rowley just about has the edge - both have equal shotstopping skills but we will never know whether he would have saved that last minute Kiddy chance which has given us 2 vital points on the board - Rowley did


Posted By: Bolehall Youth
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 12:17pm
Originally posted by Shed 1993 Shed 1993 wrote:

Yet the game before against kiddy he made a match winning save? Short memory?


But he gifted them there goal, which until then they had not been in the game. That gift gave them them the belief which put pressure on us.
Keepers for me neither. Both are to alike and to short.


Posted By: Coleshill Lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 1:38pm
Both keepers are average at best. Neither come for corners,preferring to stay on their goal line leaving it to the defenders to clear the ball.I hate that in a goalkeeper. Most of the opposing keepers we face seem to leave the goal line and catch the ball. Much better in my opinion.


Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 3:27pm
So it looks like this forum has agreed on something - we really need a new goalkeeper but hey hum that is as likely as us getting a new striker in to support our current front players


Posted By: I.O.M.Lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 5:04pm
Not sure about that Argus, given a decent amount of time Jezeph might prove that he is good enough. There is a lot of time and effort being put into the under 21's and if we don't give these guys a chance to progress then what's the point?. The thing that I do acknowledge though is supporters like myself that are happy to praise when it is deserved but also are equally prepared to criticise will need to be a little more patient and hold back some of that criticism with those younger players when the inevitable mistakes happen.


Posted By: Coton1Tam
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 7:01pm
Originally posted by Argus9 Argus9 wrote:

Not much in it and that's the problem Joey - yep side with you but neither have impressed - and that's nothing to do with who've they followed - 🔔 best seen ever down here
Not based on his final season .. and not as good as Phil Whitehead, Scott Bevan (albeit on loan), Acton and Belford  etc 


Posted By: I.O.M.Lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 7:07pm
Plus Garry Taylor and Roy Sullivan


Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 7:51pm
Originally posted by Coton1Tam Coton1Tam wrote:

Originally posted by Argus9 Argus9 wrote:

Not much in it and that's the problem Joey - yep side with you but neither have impressed - and that's nothing to do with who've they followed - 🔔 best seen ever down here
Not based on his final season .



Ok Coton - what about the previous seasons when he was actually allowed to play?



Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 8:32pm
Originally posted by I.O.M.Lamb I.O.M.Lamb wrote:

Not sure about that Argus, given a decent amount of time Jezeph might prove that he is good enough. There is a lot of time and effort being put into the under 21's and if we don't give these guys a chance to progress then what's the point?. The thing that I do acknowledge though is supporters like myself that are happy to praise when it is deserved but also are equally prepared to criticise will need to be a little more patient and hold back some of that criticism with those younger players when the inevitable mistakes happen.


Time - effort but you did not mention money IOM going into Youth (not you so don't start) - at expense of first team - 2 very tough away games coming up with a goalkeeper who can't dominate area (either) and on past form chances created but not put away - the only blessing is that we are trying to play football on floor whilst very pleasing to the eye and most welcome will still see us plummeting seriously downwards


Posted By: Argus9
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 8:38pm
Originally posted by I.O.M.Lamb I.O.M.Lamb wrote:

Plus Garry Taylor and Roy Sullivan


So your saying they were better than Bells


Posted By: I.O.M.Lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 8:56pm
All about opinions Argus, Sullivan is the best I've seen here, although I accept he wasn't with us for too long. Taylor was close behind him. I rate them both better than Belshaw. I think there are strong arguments for Belford and Acton too, but as I said, just my opinion, I'm sure others will think I'm totally wrong.


Posted By: Coton1Tam
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 9:27pm
Originally posted by Argus9 Argus9 wrote:

Originally posted by Coton1Tam Coton1Tam wrote:

Originally posted by Argus9 Argus9 wrote:

Not much in it and that's the problem Joey - yep side with you but neither have impressed - and that's nothing to do with who've they followed - 🔔 best seen ever down here
Not based on his final season .



Ok Coton - what about the previous seasons when he was actually allowed to play?

played plenty last season, made a fair few mistakes. Was a good keeper and servant. 
There have been better though 


Posted By: The dosthill lamb
Date Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 10:26pm
We have been blessed with some very good goalkeepers down the years. Roy Sullivan as mentioned by IOM Lamb was superb,and also in my opinion better than Belshaw, so it gives you some idea of how good he actually was. Pete King was another excellent keeper as was Dean Williams who we sold to Brentford as i remember. Both the lads we have at the moment are young and error prone.  


Posted By: Benesh
Date Posted: 22 Oct 2017 at 5:43pm
I like Rowley. They both have potential though.



Print Page | Close Window